http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/ Musings on the Nature of Art from An Artist in Nature Fri, 18 May 2012 11:41:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-225279 protein powder Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:52:35 +0000 http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-225279 Really informative post.Thanks Again. Really Cool. Really informative post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

]]> http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-224386 wholesale ralph lauren Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:23:41 +0000 http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-224386 Your weblog would not exhibit up appropriately on my iphone - you may perhaps wanna attempt to restore that Your weblog would not exhibit up appropriately on my iphone - you may perhaps wanna attempt to restore that

]]> http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-184130 louis vuitton handbags sale Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:19:56 +0000 http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-184130 leather training collars is definetly the most beneficial, they've also been very sturdy and last longer?????? leather training collars is definetly the most beneficial, they’ve also been very sturdy and last longer??????

]]> http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-153544 Jolie Androes Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:59:17 +0000 http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-153544 Your weblog would not exhibit up appropriately on my iphone - you may perhaps wanna attempt to restore that Your weblog would not exhibit up appropriately on my iphone - you may perhaps wanna attempt to restore that

]]> http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-135945 eyaculación precoz Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:01:10 +0000 http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-135945 I'd like in order to thank you for that initiatives you've place in composing this particular site. I'm wishing exactly the same high-grade site publish through a person within the forthcoming also. Actually your own innovative composing skills offers encouraged me personally to obtain my very own site right now. Actually the actual running a blog is actually distributing it's wings fast. Your own write down is actually a great instance of the usb ports. I’d like in order to thank you for that initiatives you’ve place in composing this particular site. I’m wishing exactly the same high-grade site publish through a person within the forthcoming also. Actually your own innovative composing skills offers encouraged me personally to obtain my very own site right now. Actually the actual running a blog is actually distributing it’s wings fast. Your own write down is actually a great instance of the usb ports.

]]> http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-135850 serrurier saint maur Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:52:56 +0000 http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-135850 Notre entreprise de serrurerie signifie établie à l'organe de Paris , nos cheville ouvrière serruriers restent au service militaire de multiples affaires et également certaines notables . Notre entreprise de serrurerie signifie établie à l’organe de Paris , nos cheville ouvrière serruriers restent au service militaire de multiples affaires et également certaines notables .

]]> http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-126597 mobile search Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:11:56 +0000 http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-126597 Hi there! This post could not be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my previous room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this page to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Many thanks for sharing! Hi there! This post could not be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my previous room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this page to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!

]]> http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-120800 Eulah Mollema Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:06:28 +0000 http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-120800 Howdy very cool site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds also?KI am satisfied to search out numerous helpful information here in the post, we want work out more techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . . Howdy very cool site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds also?KI am satisfied to search out numerous helpful information here in the post, we want work out more techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

]]> http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-120261 David Booth Tue, 15 Nov 2011 06:13:41 +0000 http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-120261 Oops, didn't realise it wouldn't publish my email, its dbooth.1@go.ccad.edu. Sorry. Ok, I'm done. Oops, didn’t realise it wouldn’t publish my email, its dbooth.1@go.ccad.edu. Sorry. Ok, I’m done.

]]> http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-120257 David Booth Tue, 15 Nov 2011 06:10:29 +0000 http://julietchapman.com/blog/2008/07/28/style-vs-content-in-art/#comment-120257 Not to knit-pick, but what this thread seems to be referring to as "realism" is more accurately called "classicism". Classicism (uncapitalised, as an adjective. Classicism capitalised refers to a specific artistic movement in history) refers to the formulaic representaion of subject in as close to a 1:1 ratio as possible. In short, if your aim is to depict your subject as accurately as possible, you are shooting for a more classic style. Classic style is the foil of romantic style, which is less concerned with accuracy and more concerned with expression. Kathe Kolowitz was a romantic. There are reasons why you might look at a work of art and think that it looks like sh*t, but you have to know the history, and you have to understand the theory before you can criticize. Artwork is not something to be taken at face value-but I digress. Like all things that are opposites, there is a spectrum in between-you can be somewhere between classic and romantic, really it's not something you want to try to categorize yourself into-it will limit your natural expression of the world. Realism, like Classicism (capitalised) refers to another specific period of art history that had less to do with depicting figures accurately for the sake of being accurate, and more to do with depicting them in such a way for socio-economic/political reasons. Like I said, I don't want to sound like a know-it-all but you have to understand that in order to be taken seriously in this field you have to know what you're talking about. There's nothing more destructive to your cred as an proper artmaker than not using the vocabulary correctly. I'll leave you all alone now. Sorry if I sounded like a jerk-was not my intention-I was just trying to impart my entire education on you in a nutshell..anyway, pick up that text, its well worth the bones, and you'll pick up a lot of theory if you're looking to be a serious artmaker. If anyone would like to know more I'd gladly answer any questions I can to the best of my ability-shoot me an email and I'll see what I can do for you. Not to knit-pick, but what this thread seems to be referring to as “realism” is more accurately called “classicism”. Classicism (uncapitalised, as an adjective. Classicism capitalised refers to a specific artistic movement in history) refers to the formulaic representaion of subject in as close to a 1:1 ratio as possible. In short, if your aim is to depict your subject as accurately as possible, you are shooting for a more classic style. Classic style is the foil of romantic style, which is less concerned with accuracy and more concerned with expression. Kathe Kolowitz was a romantic. There are reasons why you might look at a work of art and think that it looks like sh*t, but you have to know the history, and you have to understand the theory before you can criticize. Artwork is not something to be taken at face value-but I digress. Like all things that are opposites, there is a spectrum in between-you can be somewhere between classic and romantic, really it’s not something you want to try to categorize yourself into-it will limit your natural expression of the world.
Realism, like Classicism (capitalised) refers to another specific period of art history that had less to do with depicting figures accurately for the sake of being accurate, and more to do with depicting them in such a way for socio-economic/political reasons.
Like I said, I don’t want to sound like a know-it-all but you have to understand that in order to be taken seriously in this field you have to know what you’re talking about. There’s nothing more destructive to your cred as an proper artmaker than not using the vocabulary correctly.
I’ll leave you all alone now. Sorry if I sounded like a jerk-was not my intention-I was just trying to impart my entire education on you in a nutshell..anyway, pick up that text, its well worth the bones, and you’ll pick up a lot of theory if you’re looking to be a serious artmaker. If anyone would like to know more I’d gladly answer any questions I can to the best of my ability-shoot me an email and I’ll see what I can do for you.

]]>